PDA

View Full Version : Private Data???



Michael Harris
08-28-2003, 08:22 PM
Group Gets Private Data on U.S. Officials
Thu Aug 28, 8:48 AM
By JENNIFER C. KERR, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Almost everything is for sale on the Internet – even the Social Security numbers of top government officials like CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft, consumer advocates warned Wednesday.

The California-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said for $26 each it was able to purchase the Social Security numbers and home addresses for Tenet, Ashcroft, and other top Bush administration officials, including Karl Rove, the president's chief political adviser.

That illustrates the need for stronger protections of personal information, the group said.

The CIA declined to comment, and calls to the Justice Department were not immediately returned.

Specifically, the foundation is concerned about legislation in the House that would amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The bill, sponsored by Reps. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., Darlene Hooley, D-Ore., and dozens of other members, aims to prevent identity theft and improve the accuracy of consumer records, among other things.

While backing the overall goals of the bill, the group's executive director, Jamie Court, objected to a portion of it that would continue a current pre-emption of tougher state privacy laws.

California Gov. Gray Davis signed such legislation Wednesday, which allows consumers to block companies from sharing personal information with affiliate businesses.

"Banks and insurers should not be able to go to Washington as an end-run around the most protective state privacy laws," Court said.

Bankers say the industry highly regulates the sharing of personal information. Even so, Diane Casey-Landry, president and CEO of America's Community Bankers, said there is support for a national standard for privacy. She said states adopting a patchwork of different rules could lead to new barriers for consumers seeking loans and increase the cost of loans because of the additional paperwork.

The Bush administration has urged Congress to act quickly to strengthen the nation's credit laws and has praised the House bill. It is expected to come up for a vote in the first few weeks after lawmakers return from their August recess.

A spokesman for Bachus, Evan Keefer, said the legislation has important new provisions that will be tough on fraud. He said the issue raised by the foundation is something lawmakers would look at in conference, after votes in the House and Senate.

The foundation wants to see a strong national law on credit reporting, but Court said that should not preclude states from passing even stronger privacy protections.

He said stopping trafficking of information among corporate affiliates is key because some companies have hundreds of businesses under the family umbrella. For example, a banking corporation might have a number of insurance, securities and real estate affiliates it does business with and financial data might be swapped among all.

"If you cannot stop the traffic in your information among corporate affiliates, you don't have privacy in this nation," Court said.

In addition to Social Security numbers, he said some online sites will give out a person's bank account balance for about $300.

Beth Givens, director of Privacy Rights Clearinghouse based in San Diego, said there are at least a dozen sites that provide Social Security numbers and other private data.

"If you're willing to spend a little money, you can get this type of information very easily on the Internet," said Givens.

Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Michael Harris
08-28-2003, 08:24 PM
MARKETPLACE NPR - Minnesota Public Radio
Jul 16, 2003
by Anchor: David Brancaccio/Commentary: Jamie Court

Private companies selling or exchanging information including Social Security numbers without your permission

DAVID BRANCACCIO, anchor: There's a flip side to this fake ID business. The names and numbers being traded just might be yours. At least this much is for certain, there's a robust above ground market for personal details most of us would rather keep to ourselves. It's common practice for private companies to sell or exchange information, including Social Security numbers, without our permission. Commentator and activist Jamie Court worries that officials don't appreciate how dangerously free wheeling this marketplace has become.

JAMIE COURT: I bought the Social Security numbers of John Ashcroft, CIA Director George Tenet and Karl Rove for $26 each on the Internet. Their home addresses and telephone numbers cost a little more. For $295, another Internet service says it will sell me bank account balances.

Corporations have so freely traded in the individual's private information that almost everyone's privacy is at risk, so much so that nine out of 10 people think that corporations should obtain consent before selling an individual's private information, but year after year, this simple proposition has been defeated in statehouse after statehouse by America's biggest banks and
insurers.

This week, Californians could lead the counterstrike to create a 'do not sell my private information without my permission' list. Privacy advocates are expected to finish collecting enough signatures to put the issue directly to California voters in March.

If the fifth largest economy in the world requires a corporation to get consent from individuals before selling their information, the standard will become a bellwether for the nation. The privacy issue was so popular in the 2000 election that George Bush campaigned on it. Bush promised to make it a criminal offense to sell a person's Social Security number without their permission.

Today the White House may be the last private place. I couldn't buy President Bush's Social Security number because he's too famous. The one man with the power to change the law is one of the only people in America who, by conscious design, doesn't need protection from it. President Bush should recognize that the public hunger for privacy is an unstoppable force and
deliver on his promises.

FTC Chairman Timothy Muris, who polices identity theft, should be for it. I bought his Social Security number, too. If President Bush doesn't deliver, then he should put his Social Security number up for sale, but not for any more than anyone else's cost to buy: 26 bucks. In Los Angeles, I'm Jamie Court for MARKETPLACE.

BRANCACCIO: The comments of Jamie Court, a consumer activist and author of "Corporateering: How Corporate Power Steals Your Personal Freedom...and What You Can Do About It."

Michael Harris
08-28-2003, 08:26 PM
NEWS RELEASE
Jun 17, 2003

CONTACT: Jamie Court - 310-392-0522 x327
No Financial Privacy For Californians, None For Politicians Who Stop Bill

Social Security Numbers Of Assembly Members & Governor Released

The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) released the first four digits of the social security numbers of California politicians who voted down long awaited financial privacy legislation today in the California Assembly Banking and Finance Committee, and who could reconsider the bill as early as Monday.

Only Assembly Members Wiggins, Chan and Corbett voted "yes."

FTCR purchased those social security numbers on the Internet for $26 as a demonstration of how at risk individuals' personal financial information is without new privacy protections.

In addition, FTCR also published on the Internet the first three digits of Governor Davis's social security number because, although the governor declared support for the bill, Davis could force passage of the bill by using his personal influence with reluctant committee members or with the Speaker of the Assembly to appoint new committee members for the day if he chose to. Read FTCR's letter to Davis at http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporate/fs/fs003414.php3

Davis has said individuals' personal information should not be traded like baseball cards. FTCR posted its own version of Davis's trading card at http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/assets/scans/DavisPrivacyCard.jpg which includes the first three digits of his social security number. FTCR said, if Davis is serious about privacy, he should personally appear at the reconsideration hearing and personally work the vote.

"Politicians who are unwilling to protect their constituents privacy must realize that they have no privacy until new laws are passed," said Jamie Court, FTCR's executive director and author of Corporateering: How Corporate Power Steals Your Personal Freedom And What You Can Do About It. "No governor whose party controls both houses of the legislature could not get this popular a bill on his desk if he used all his influence. That a Democratic legislature has not passed such a modest step as requiring written consent before private information is shared shows the stranglehold of corporateering over the statehouse."

Banks, insurance companies and other corporate interests have spent more than $20 million in campaign contributions and lobbying expenses to kill the financial privacy bill, SB 1. A ballot initiative is now circulating with even stronger financial privacy protections and could be on the March ballot, potentially the same ballot as Governor Davis's recall.

"The committee members have sided with the corporateers and once again sold out California's chance to be a national leader on privacy protection," said Jerry Flanagan, a consumer advocate for FTCR. "Legislators must realize that their privacy is just as vulnerable as that of every Californian. The people of California will now have their say at the ballot box."

FTCR removed its opposition of the bill pending the adoption of amendments proposed in the committee analysis dated June 15, 2003 that would clearly require written consent before private information is shared and close a forty five day window allowing banks to share information regarding new accounts even after consent is denied.

Previous versions of the financial privacy bill, SB 1, have foundered in the Assembly Banking and Finance Committee as a result of opposition from bank-friendly legislators. Of the twelve members of the Banking and Finance Committee, only Assembly Member Lou Correa's social security number was not available on-line.

The social security numbers of Assembly Banking and Finance Committee Members opposed to SB 1 follow:

BOGH, RUSSELL VINCENT
CHERRY VALLEY, CA
550-6X-XXXX

CALDERON, RONALD S
MONTEBELLO, CA
546-2X-XXXX

CHAVEZ, EDWARD L
LA PUENTE, CA
565-4X-XXXX

HOUSTON, GUY S
SAN RAMON, CA
562-2X-XXX

LESLIE, TIM
PLEASANTON, CA
559-5X-XXXX

MONTANEZ, CINDY
SAN FERNANDO, CA
553-9X-XXXX

STRICKLAND, ANTHONY A
THOUSAND OAKS, CA
573-0X-XXXX

VARGAS, JUAN C
SAN DIEGO, CA
550-1X-XXXX

The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) is a non-profit and non-partisan consumer advocacy organization. For more information, visit us on the web at www.consumerwatchdog.org or for more information about Corporateering visit www.corporateering.org .

Flora Porter
09-23-2004, 04:31 PM
Micheal,

Thanks for the awareness report about Private Data being made
public across the board.

You really do bring meaningful useful information to the table.
Thanks Mike.


Flora

Cleo Evans--
09-27-2004, 03:18 PM
Michael,

What a great read! I'm so glad I came across this in the afternoon and not late at night! :cool:

I also like the "consumerwatchdog" site.
...and Sue Grafton! :D

Have a nice day,
Cleo